Sunday, February 5, 2012

I Survived Jason Wu for Target



... Others were not so lucky


The initial announcement for the Jason Wu for Target line showcased simply adorable, gamine, and precious clothes. Sweet, really. Parisian chic. Civilized.

The roll-up gates raised at Target at 8:00 a.m. on a Sunday, and the stampede began. I crossed the threshold at 8:02 a.m., and found bare racks (save for the XL sizes), wild-eyed and crazed (primarily) female shoppers, the lucky few grasping a mound of clothes and sprinting for the dressing rooms. The Target employees gathered around, trying to soothe nerves and keep the peace. One ran to sporting goods to outfit himself with a taser (unfortunately, the line of designer tasers that launched the week before had resulted in a pared down stock there as well). 


A three-item limit was imposed on those attempting to use the dressing room, so others just dropped trou in the clothing section and even in the aisles of housewares, using the rugs and throw pillows to shield themselves from the eyes of curious Sunday-morning shoppers.

After the initial wave, a few rejected items replenished the racks. The gathered crowd sprang in for the deposited skirts and dresses. In one such case, two ladies grabbed hold of the same item, and fought. One shrieked the explanation that she deserved it because "I got here BEFORE eight!" Well, well, well. I wouldn't argue with the other woman, who was built like a linebacker, and could certainly level you to the floor. The shrieker, eventually, gave up.

Then the barter system reigned. Girls who had just grasped items willy-nilly were now left holding precious cargo that didn't escape the others' eyes. So they began offering their own misguided pickups in a trade for the other offcasts, before the clothing could be put back into the open market. Shirts changed hands for skirts; a flouncy dress traded for an 8 ball of cocaine. One woman, who was pushing a stroller with twins, decided she could spare one of her babies, and swapped for the trench coat. I'm sure her husband will understand.     

Only three major casualties were observed: One woman tried to stand her ground, holding a couple of dresses for a friend, waving back the hoard with a tiki torch from the outdoor section. The crowd pushed forward, undeterred, and bludgeoned the girl with a Michael Graves toaster. The second girl was strangled by the very object of her desire, a Jason Wu scarf with a sweet little kitty on it. Third, yet another girl was smothered by a Tickle-Me-Elmo, a former exclusive item that caused a Target frenzy. Elmo cackled maniacally throughout the proceeding. 

On this Superbowl Sunday, the true battle was not between the Giants and Patriots. It was between the XLs and the Wu loyalists. 

Btw, I came away from the store with three pieces, two of which I may be putting up for sale later. I'll take a large suitcase full of money for the black lampshade skirt and a unicorn for the red striped dress (shown above). 


Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Does Anyone Really Like A-Rod?

Alex Rodriguez is fairly universally hated, disliked, scorned, mocked and trashed, even by Yankees fans. Does anyone really actually like him?

Does it really matter if he's liked? Well, no. I hate him and hate to admit this, but he is supremely talented, drug-use aside. But talent does not make asshattery any more palatable. And he seems to be successful at the baseball regardless of whether he's admired for being himself.

Admittedly, as a long-time Mariner's fan, I have 252 million reasons to hate him, to think he's a selfish jerk and a turncoat of Lebron Jamesian proportions. He's the guy who claimed that, after he departed the team and the Mariners went on to win 116 games in 2001, that those wins were courtesy of him—that he helped create that team, and he was, therefore, a part of all those wins. Yes, while he played for another American League West team. Seriously?

But it seems that the team members in Texas disliked him, the fans despised him and felt that his huge albatross of a contract meant that they couldn't gather up a winning team. So all those people are out of the likers too.

And even Yankees fans do not seem to be a fan of him personally. I'm sure they appreciate him helping the team out, but I don't think he's winning any personality contests there, either, which is striking, because few Yankees fans would win them either. Hardee har har. I'm joking. Don't come after me.

And now he has even filed an objection to the poor bankrupt Texas Rangers, because they haven't compensated him all the way, and when he's swimming through his Vault O'Millions, he can detect that he's missing a few cool pieces of coin. Seriously? When you make gobs and gobs of money, is $25 million really going to change things all that much? "Oh, well I was going to buy a fleet of 747s, but if I had that extra $25 million, I could add a 777 for those special trips" (Silly me, I just looked it up. Apparently, it costs at least $205 million for a 777. Though, with what Alex has made so far in his career, he could actually afford that ...).

Clearly, also, his ex wife is not a huge fan, and I wonder how Madonna and Kate Hudson feel about him now.

Anyhoodle, I guess the point is that I don't like him, I don't know anyone who actually likes him, and I wonder if there is anyone out there who would want to go hang with A-Rod, go have a beer after work, and talk all about him and his various achievements and his awesomeness and how he's the youngest to 600 home runs blah blah ... I sure wouldn't.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

The Meaning of Skinny ... Redefined by Marketers

This morning I received a message advertising a new sandwich being offered at Potbelly as part of the company's skinny offerings. The name of the sandwich: 3 Cheese Bacon Tomato Melt. So you have a sandwich with "skinny" as part of its name that includes not one, not two, but THREE cheeses and BACON? It sounds amazing, but not at all healthy.

Perhaps it's the size of my pinky toe, which means you can eat it and only gain 12 pounds.

Let's just use Potbelly's handy nutritional calculator. The new sandwich doesn't yet exist as part of the selection there, but lets assume (even if it will make an ass out of u and me) that all three cheeses offered at PB are part of it. So I selected Swiss, provolone and American. When I tacked on the bacon, here are the deets: Calories: 379 (actually not too shabby); Total Fat: 15 grams; Saturated Fat: 8 grams (38% of Daily Value); Sodium: 732 mg (31% of DV). Might as well tack on some Mayo to make it really good for you.

Monday, January 25, 2010

Jumping the Jersey Shore


Jersey Shore Season 2? Bad, terrible, horrible very bad idea MTV. An even worse idea than a woman buying one of these and wearing it to a job interview.

Now don't assume that I'm some TV snob and I'm writing this from some sort of high horse where I'm claiming the show is trash, not worth watching, etc. I would never say such a thing, because I happen to lurve junky reality television. It's such a pleasure for me I wouldn't even say I feel guilty. (And a Catholic girl who enjoys something that doesn't riddle her with guilt is a very big deal indeed.)

The thing with a second season of Jersey Shore is that the magic of eight fame-seeking so-called (by themselves) Guidos and Guidettes, whoring themselves at the expense of their dignity, will be lost. They all signed on to a television show meant to spoof their chosen or adopted lifestyles. Jersey Shore had the makings of a hit show from the start and the ability to propel those who could stand out into instant footnotes on pop culture history. Consider this, two days after the show aired, there was already a Jersey Shore nickname generator. This thing was gold.

Just so we're clear, I'm not arguing that reality television represents reality. There's two segments of reality stars that constitute the most compelling of characters. You have those who know that they're on a show, and they have to make a name for themselves; they have to stand out. These are the characters that invent catchphrases that will be uttered and replayed for years until they overplay (and sometimes then reappear years later in ironic usage). Consider Cristian Siriano and "fierce." On the other side of the coin is the pure crazy, the guy or gal who was cast for the show, but who has no idea how he or she is going to be perceived by the American public, and therefore becomes legend (Tatiana del Toro). The second type is prone to epic meltdowns, and the promise of such is the reason that people tune in to watch. In some ways the pure crazy contestant is the sadder of the ones who are remembered for their stint on a show, because they had no idea they were set to be mocked and ridiculed before they disappear.

Now how does that relate to Jersey Shore? Admittedly, these eight ranged from various degrees of self awareness and delusion.

You have Mike "The Situation" Sorrentino, who developed a schtick that could extend to future reality superstardom or, perhaps, even beyond. I'm not saying this guy is the future governor of the state of New Jersey—especially since he's actually from New York—but he has developed a very marketable persona for the cameras, and that just may land him his own show. But the thing is he's in on the joke made at his own expense. He's clearly playing up the whole ladies-man thing, the greasy charm that has led to countless hookups at the shore, but he almost carries that off with a half wink at the cameras that are going to carry his nickname, and his persona, to the masses, and at the same time, to the bank. "The Situation" has become a pop cultural phenomenon in himself. When you have various people instantly spoofing you on television talk shows, on blogs and through their Facebook status updates, you've made it.

At the other end of the spectrum was Angelina, whose bitchness played terribly on TV and was self-deluded that people would find her brand of crazy appealing.

But what about Snooki, who has both a touch of self-delusion and crazy, but also has seemingly warmed the hearts of America? She's found fame outside the show as well, having appeared alongside "The Situation" on many a late night talk show. On the Shore, she didn't seem to have the shrewd head for, well, anything, but her stupidity masks a higher ambition: her own show, which she offered up just after Jersey Shore aired ... Snookin' for Love.

And then you have Vinnie, who's a snoozefest and actually a bit high brow for the Jersey Shore set; unless I'm wrong, you won't catch Vinnie as part of the future airing of VH1's, I love the Aughts. Not interesting or crazy and not trashy or catchphrasy enough. (Though he did fist pump with giant pit sweatstains, but that was completely unintentionally funny and likely something that caused him great embarrassment when he saw the show later.)

Now back to my point, which is this, Jersey Shore won't have the same appeal, especially if either of two things happen: The same cast is used and the cast is actually paid thousands of dollars to appear. The cast members that are aware of how they are perceived on the show and online will milk their faux personalities to the hilt, and it'll grow tired so quickly. The others are either too self unaware or too boring to really make up for it, and what was once a pure genius glimpse at a set of fame whores before they found said infamy will be tainted by that achievement. Case in point: Milking MTV for $10,000 an episode.

The guts of the show will be ripped out; the phenomenon should just end with the tanning-making, gym-going, laundry-doing original.


Thursday, December 31, 2009

Jokes for the Restaurant Thaitanic


While driving past the restaurant, Thaitanic, in Northwest D.C., a couple of jokes came to mind:

1. After eating there, you get a sinking feeling in your stomach.

2. No beverages are served with ice.

3. The band members are the last ones to leave at night.


Wednesday, December 30, 2009

When Morning People Attack!


Yesterday was particularly frosty in the D.C. area, and trudging to the Metro and from the Metro in the virtual darkness of a winter morning while half asleep was considerably lame. Let's just say the melatonin buildup in my body was especially high, and my psyche was burdened with having to be at work on a week that should have been a holiday, as many others in the area were off toasty in their beds, sleeping off the nog.

So, I wasn't very aware of my surroundings, is what I'm saying; in other words: dark, cold, sleepy, depressing ...

I emerge from the Metro tunnel and ride the escalator up, still aforementionedly groggy. Posted at the top of the escalator is a woman handing out brochures. She attempts to shove one at me, but my hands were buried deep in thick gloves, and further buried deeply in my pockets. I didn't reach out for one, as it would likely have caused my body temperature to drop 6 degrees, sending me in to hypothermic shock. Further, my fuzzy brain barely registered the interaction, which wasn't the case on her end ...

I walk past, and she says in a sickly sweet tone, "Good morning to you, TOO!"

Whaaaaa??? I was judged by the brochure passer-outer! How unfair is that? It's not like I was expecting to have my path crossed by someone I had to interact with, much less someone trying to make me do something. It's probable I didn't even want the brochure, whatever it was. And, I'm not a morning person, and shouldn't be judged by those who are.

I guess this is a sign that I've fully assimilated into D.C. culture. When I first landed here from laid-back and friendly Seattle, I would've likely taken six brochures and carried on a 12 minute conversation with the lady out of politeness. But now, I have one thing to say to her: Suck it, Judgey Brochure Lady.

Back in the Blog Business

Monday, June 8, 2009

Lobster Status Update: Nats Have Huge Winning Percentage in Games Attended by Stuffed Animal



Holy crap, y'all. The Rally Lobster is amazing. Here's the rundown of the games, attended by the lobster, since this was posted. 

May 15

Lobster attends game without me. Gets a new name; doesn't like it, apparently and the Nationals lose in the 12th inning. Could be a possibility, too, that the R.L. doesn't like games that head into extra innings. His game-saving abilities might be limited to a full nine. 

May 21

Washington beats the Pirates with a come-from behind two runs scored in the bottom of the 8th. 

May 24

Against local "rivals" the O's, the Nationals score four runs in the bottom of the 7th to take the game 8-5. 

June 3

Rainout, but it would have been interesting if the game had been played. As a Mariners fan as well, I would've been torn to have Randy Johnson lose his 300th game because of the lobster. Next night, he won the makeup game. 

June 6

The Nationals back up John Lannan's good-for-a-National pitching performance with seven runs, mostly courtesy of the home-run ball. Lobster entered the stadium just as the first three runs were logged in the bottom of thBolde 1st. Although the 4 runs were added for insurance in the 4th and the 5th, all the team needed were those three that were courtesy of lobster's arrival. 

Record for the Nationals today: 15-40
Record for the Nationals in games when the lobster is at the game: 6-1-1
Wins: 6
Losses: 1
Rainout: ?
No Decision: 1

So almost half the Nationals' wins are in games where it's been there. I think the proof is in the stuffing. 


Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Nats Wins Brought to You by … Lobster?



With a 7-17 record, the 2009 Washington Nationals are off to what may be considered a sloooow start (let’s remain positive, people, no need to chase after Manny Acta with pitchforks … yet). The team may have not have an obvious ace on the mound, or a batting superstar who will singlehandedly save this current season by belting out runs each game, but they do have a boost coming from a very unlikely place: a stuffed animal—a lobster, to be specific. This plush has attended four games now, and the team has sported a 3-1 record for those games attended. Consider this evidence:

April 16, 2009

The lobster was picked by a partial-season-ticket holder around 3 p.m. as part of a free swag sweep on a trade show floor. He was thrown, haphazardly, into a complimentary bag with Post-It Notes, postcards, brochures, pens and candy. His acquisition was merely a blip on the Swag Gatherer’s radar, but what happened next may become the stuffing of legends.

That evening, playing the Phillies, the Nats were up by three runs, which were scored in the first inning. Up until this point in the new season, the team had posted a staggering 0-6 record, so it was not looking good for our hometown team. The Swag Gatherer (S.G.) came to the game late, in time for the main event, i.e., the President’s Race in the middle of the fourth inning. Soon after, the S.G. started distributing the loot to her other season-ticket-holder friends. The lobster finally saw the stadium floodlights, and the game began to really heat up for the Washington Nationals.

The Phillies battled back within one run by the fifth inning, but the Nats added more to the score, with one run in the seventh and four in the eighth. The Washington team finally was able to hold onto that lead; the first curly W was logged in the books.

As the game closed, the lobster was dubbed the Lucky Lobster by the season-ticket holders, but with only one win under his shell, a trend was not yet established.

April 19, 2009

A breezy Sunday afternoon marked the lobster’s second game. The mighty Marlins came to D.C. and quickly fell behind by two runs in the first. The Marlins scored one run in the third, but the Nats added one for insurance in the fifth. Florida struck again with one run scored in the sixth, but the Nats held onto their lead through the seventh.

As it started to get really cold in the seventh inning, and with the Nationals ahead by one, the season-ticket holders left the stadium. When they just had walked out the gate, lobster in totebag, the group heard the crowd groan as the tying run was hit out of the park. The Nats ended up losing that game, 7 to 4.

April 21, 2009

Unlike the previous two games the now so-called Rally Lobster attended, the Atlanta Braves struck first in the first, leaving the inning up three to nothin’. The Nats scored in the second and again with three runs in the sixth, and the team held on to that narrow lead to take the game, 4 to 3.

May 2, 2009

The Nationals record now included five wins, when the rally lobster made it to his third game. An extremely dominant Shairon Martis no-hit the Cardinals until the fifth inning, and the Nationals got four runs in the bottom. The only mistake allowed by Martis was a lead off home run in the seventh, and the Nats added two more in the eighth to close it out.

Boiling point

As this trend reaches that pitch that a lobster makes when you drop it into the pot, some may argue that the true reason those games were won were Martis and bolstered by Ryan Zimmerman’s 21-game hitting streak, Adam Dunn and Nick Johnson. Sure, this writer acknowledges that those very well paid professional ball players contributed, but there may be some assist from the No. 11 on the team (No. 10 being the fans, of course): the Rally Lobster.


Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Letter to the Intended Pollen-Editors



Dear cute little kids with your fundraising car wash, 

Thank you for hosting a car wash in D.C. this past weekend. You did a really good job making those signs and the location you picked, on Wisconsin Ave. in Georgetown, was brilliant. I also commend you on picking the first 90 degree day to hold your car wash; the weather was gorgeous and, with no rain in sight, you probably had a bunch of takers. I hope you raised a ton of money for your sports team/band/chess club/whatever. 

I also like to say I admire your enthusiasm as I pulled up to the traffic light next to you. Your shrieking pierced right through the loud music I had blasting on my stereo. But pointing and laughing at my green-pollen-dusted car was not appreciated. Suggesting that I needed to have my icky car washed, while correct, was not the best marketing strategy. You see, I park my car under a tree, and until that tree decides it's done with its business, I will not be paying anyone to hose it off. 

Thanks so much for trying, 
This blogger 

Creative Differences



My blog and I have spent some time apart, recently, as we experienced creative differences. My blog really wanted to have imaginative posts, and I did not feel that I could perform such feats at that time. 

I blame the haze brought on by the heavy use of Zyrtec, which was being used to handle the green pollen-ic haze that has settled over the D.C. area. This allergy pill dropped me into a Rip-Van-Winkle-type drowse, but I somehow went about my day without really no recollection of what I did or where the time went. What year is it? Why do I somehow have, in my possession, a suitcase full of unmarked bills? Perhaps allergy meds should be enlisted in government experiments at controlling people and keeping them in line?

Anywho, two news items caught my attention on Monday. I know it's Wednesday, and it's long old news. I also realize that I'm pretending to be a blogger, and, therefore, should be breaking all sorts of news myself. But, give me some time to get with this. Anyway, back to Monday: The first was a local report interrupting GMA—which is fine because all that show seems to focus on lately is Susan Boyle and her incredible shot at British and Internet stardom, ho hum—to announce that seven Greenpeace activists had scaled a construction crane near the State Department, draping a large banner and themselves from it. The report said that most of the major routes into downtown from Virginia were being closed off while they extracted the activists from the crane. I don't mind the whole protest thing; I just think that screwing up people's commutes is a really poor way to get your message across, especially on a beautiful Monday morning when they'd rather be sipping margaritas in the backyard than stuck in their cars on a bridge over the Potomac. Just saying. 

The second report centered on a brilliant group of frat boys at The George Washington University, who decided to grease their Slip 'n' Slide at a philanthropy event with laundry detergent, resulting in trips to the hospital for sorority girls for treatment of chemical burns. Doesn't a Slip 'n' Slide only require water to work? Isn't that the point? If you're using a Slip 'n' Slide and going to the hospital for reasons other than sprains and broken bones, you're doing it wrong. Also note that, semi-ironically, the event was to support the Firefighters Burn Foundation ...

That's all for now, folks. 

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Goitus Interruptus



The other day, my sweetheart and I were playing one of those fun hypothetical relationship games, where you make the other person super uncomfortable by asking questions such as, "If I became horribly disfigured, would you still like me?" And, then, of course, you become incensed by whatever the answer happens to be. Wheee! 

(So, being the woman in the relationship, I, of course, maybe would be prone to acting a bit irrationally when these things come up, but whatever. Mars and Venus, blah blah.) 

This is what went down: I asked, all so innocently, "Say I didn't eat enough iodized salt, and ended up getting a goiter. Would you still go out with me?" Harmless, right? To which! To which, he replied, "Nope." 

WHAT?! I'd be the same person! I'd still be cute, right? Regardless of the giant growth on my neck ... The ever-growing increase in size of the thyroid ... What's the big deal, yo? I would still have the same sparkling hi-larious personality. What a jerky thing to say ... 

... Except, I ran this very same scenario past my friends today, and the responses varied from a mild, "No, probably not," to "Hell, no! I wouldn't even talk to you anymore, and I'd likely run the other way when I saw you coming." And this was before we even did a Google image search and found horrific sickening pictures of goiters the size of the person's head, bulging out beneath her chin. Ok, I guess they may have a point.

Two things: You don't find out who your true friends are until you're actually inflicted by a goiter, and do all you can now to prevent such a thing from happening to you. You wouldn't want to test your friends' loyalty, finding yourself alone and goitered. 

I'm now gonna go start an iodized salt lick in my apartment and start drinking more margaritas just so I can use the salted rim to ward off social pariah-dom. Cheers! 


Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Just for the Cheap Celebrity of It!



So, I find myself watching what may be termed "a lot" of reality TV—Don't judge. I can feel you judging—Worthwhile entertainment does exist out there, especially on Bravo, and especially the Project Runways and Top Chefs. But, despite my fandom, I have to take an opposing stance to Diet Coke's new TV ads*. The recent ads featured PR's Heidi Klum and TC's Tom Colicchio. 

Um, Diet Coke, I'm worried about the direction this is going. Sure, Heidi was a supermodel or whatever, and she's nice and all, but you used to get people like Penelope Cruz and Adrian Brody. And Tom is lovably curmudgeonly, but he's really not an official celebrity. You also used to have Paula Abdul, before she became a reality TV star, when she actually made her own music and before she went all wacky and nonsensical. But she's nice, I guess. 

Anyway, I am just concerned that we'll soon be seeing Diet Coke spots with Real Housewives and that shrill Jeff from Flipping Out, doing such over the fact that someone brought him a Diet Pepsi (or God forbid, Jonathan from Blowout, crying his eyes out and seeing his therapist over his love of Diet Coke ... Yikes). Do you see my concern here? You have an established brand to protect here, and this is a potentially very slippery slope down to having Tool Academy endorsers.  

Don't get me wrong, those shows are guilty pleasures for me, but I don't think I want to have those people making me feel like I need to be enjoying a tall frosty glass of Aspartame. 

* Which, as an owner of TiVo, I wouldn't typically be viewing, except that I had to watch the last part of the Oscars live since I got home late and didn't want to be behind on watercooler discussions in the morning; I didn't have a choice. Had to watch those silly commercial interruptions, not the product placementy commercials that appear as part of the reality TV shows (Bluefly.com Accessories Wall. Quaker Oats Challenge). But that's another post entirely. 


The Pet Shop Choice



The story about the pet chimpanzee that went berserk and mauled a family friend has got me thinking about the appropriateness of having certain animals as housepets. A Google search suggests that chimps have struck before and again some more.

But what about your typical house pet, such as a dog, cat or kimodo dragon? Let's talk about one of my pets, a vicious beast named Ivy. When I was a senior in high school, my dad brought home Ivy, a runt-of-the-litter kitten. She was an adorable, sickly thing—two traits that masked her inner Cujo. She started out weak and cute, but upon healing turned into a skittish monster. She attacked anything and everything that moved, those mostly being my parents and me. She'd lie in wait for someone to walk by, then spring on the victim in full aggression, tearing at the skin with her teeth while digging in with her claws. My hands were constantly torn apart from when I tried to pet her.

And she was wily, too. Often she'd wait to attack until after my mother had put on her nylon stockings—oh yes, Ivy knew what she was doing—she would rend them apart. And it wasn't just the claws and the teeth we had to worry about.

I would sleep with a water glass on my headboard, right behind my pillow, so I could hydrate in the middle of the night. On the nights when I would forget to close my bedroom door, Ivy would slink in at 6:00 a.m., seek out the water glass and swat at it until she knocked it over, spilling it all over me. This happened time and time again, a early morning drenching, and I know she plotted it out throughout the night, constantly checking the door to see it ajar, ready to make her move.

So, I believe my point is, what makes a kitten such as Ivy a naturally better pet than a chimpanzee? I believe it's an individual pet and the care and treatment of it that makes for a good animal. I grew up with a perfect companion in a cocker spaniel; she never let me down nor tried to drown me in my sleep or attempted to tear my face off. Just saying. Be careful for what you bring in your home. The more you know ...


Monday, February 23, 2009

OK, OK, I'm Here. Gawd!



So, some people were harassing me because I hadn't updated this thing since just after I started it. And, sure, that's true, but I haven't had much to say over the past week. Sure, I've been updating my Facebook status, but that takes very little time and creativity. And I should be washing dishes right now, instead of succumbing to peer pressure, but I've never been very strong avoiding suggestions.

So here you go, all two of you that read this thing so far...a culling of my favorite status updates from the past week. Enjoy!

Andrea is now in the market for a new nose, as the one she had froze off on the walk back from lunch. Her sniffles are gone, though.

Andrea couldn't find her moisturizing gloves last night, and as it's desert-dry in her apartment, had to wear socks on her hands.

(For those in the D.C. area, this'll make sense) Andrea wonders why Tyson made his corner so difficult to get to.

Andrea just did the backstroke in the flooded office kitchen.

Andrea wonders what excuse she's gonna use to forgo the gym tonight.

Andrea received a press release touting products called "Gainfully Employed Fixtures," "Hardworking Taxpayer Table Lamps," and "Honest Wall Street Sconces." Seriously. (That's making light of the economy! Or looking at the bright side in this our darkest hour.)

Andrea thinks the people who claim that chewing gum will curb your desire to snack are stupid.

(My personal favorite) Andrea wonders if Judd Gregg actually withdrew his nomination because he had to go get his excess consonants surgically removed.

Andrea heard Marion Barry say, "that bitch, Uncle Sam, set me up."

Andrea does not recommend chopping an onion, then putting in one's contact lenses shortly afterward.


Monday, February 9, 2009

Geez!



Dear Family of Elephants Who Apparently Live Upstairs,

My goodness! What are you doing? Why are you jumping around? Why are spoons falling out of my dish rack? Why does it feel like my ceiling is caving in?

Please calm down now and stop your wrestling match or circus performance. It's 10:00 p.m. on a Monday, for goodness sake.

Thank you muchly,
A the E

P.S. I expect that you won't forget that I sent you this message. After all, you are elephants ...


Helllllooo Subscriber!



I heard you're out there...somewhere.


Try, Try Again



Sooo, this isn't my first stint here in the ol' blogosphere, but hopefully this will be a lasting one. I need some sort of ongoing creative outlet, and I like to share things I observe; this couples those two things perfectly.

My previous blogging life played out, happily, on a party barge. It was fun being part of a team, sharing all of our random experiences, but that fizzled out in 2007. So now I've been set adrift, on my own. Time will tell whether I sink this ship too.

So, the title. Right. About that. A running joke if you will. When you really incensed about something, you flip the table (or the desk) you happen to be seated at and storm out of the room. So many observances here ... will be of that variety. I happen to get fired up often. Enjoy!